About me

Tuesday, 19 July 2016

Response to Thangam Debbonaire MP's attack on Jeremy Corbyn

On Sunday, my local MP Thangam Debbonaire (whom I have previously criticised on this blog for taking part in the coup against Jeremy Corbyn) released a statement via her Facebook page where she details her experiences of working as Shadow Arts and Culture Minister under Jeremy Corbyn (the statement in full can be found here). Over the past few days, this has become viral, and I haven't seen any left-wing blogger respond to it yet. For a Corbyn supporter, it is of course extremely tempting to ignore it and hope that people forget about it, but I don't find that to be a particularly honest way of handling things, so I will give my take on it as best I can.

I will not deny that I was shocked by the experiences that Debbonaire describes. To me, her explanations of specific incidents seem to be truthful and accurate, and I will give her the benefit of the doubt as far as that is concerned. I also want it on record that, provided that her experiences actually did happen as she describes them, I take back my criticism of her on a previous blog concerning her decision to step down as Minister. Whilst I remain extremely disgruntled by the Labour MPs seeking to undemocratically discredit their leader, I can also see that on occasion specific incidents make it impossible for an individual to continue holding a certain position, regardless of the impact this may have on any larger movements or counter-movements connected with it.

Having said that, I am not prepared to end my support for Corbyn purely on the basis of this revelation. Much as I will take on board Debbonaire's words when considering how I will react to matters concerning Corbyn in the future, a single person's negative experience is not sufficient to reverse the respect that I have built up for a person over a sustained period of time, as I have with Jeremy Corbyn (in the same way that much as I commended David Cameron for championing equal marriage, this was not enough for me to forgive all of the damage he inflicted with all his other policy decisions). Debbonaire claims that other MPs have had similar experiences, but without those experiences being discussed individually they cannot be counted to support her assertion of him being a bad leader generally. There are three sides to every story - yours, mine and the truth. Although Debbonaire's point of view should be believed and respected, without having heard Jeremy Corbyn's interpretation of what went on we cannot hope to understand the circumstances behind these errors, therefore it is not practical to completely shift focus based on a single dissenting voice (albeit the only dissenting voice out of the many in the Labour Party who has actually said anything that comes across as remotely honest).

But there is something even more important that needs to taken into account when we're analysing people's experiences of Jeremy Corbyn and using that to make a decision about whether and how to vote. Which is that Corbyn has faults. That is to be expected, as all human beings do, and some of those faults may be a quite significant hindrance to him continuing to be an icon of the left in the future (not that they necessarily will, but we must accept that they might do). But right at this moment, those faults don't matter to me very much. What matters is that Corbyn has consistently voted against draconian bills put forward in Parliament, argued against nuclear war, championed funding of public services, generally is more of an opposition to the Tories than any of the past Labour leaders in recent years, and fundamentally, Corbyn has swathes of public support. And right now, he is the only decent politician in Westminster who has that level of support. There are other politicians who represent my understanding of what politics should be about more than Corbyn does - I think Caroline Lucas is awesome, I have a lot of time for Nicola Sturgeon's SNP representatives and whilst I don't personally know a great deal about Tim Farron, I have heard good things about him from contacts of mine who are more invested in Liberal Democrat policies than I am. None of these people though have the opportunity right now that Jeremy Corbyn has. Though I usually vote for them and their support is growing all the time, the Green Party is not currently big enough to pose enough of a threat to take on the Tories. The SNP has done very commendable work in Scotland, but we need some more socialist values across the rest of the UK as well. The Liberal Democrats, perhaps unfairly, are still suffering from the mess-up over tuition fees in 2010. I have a great deal of respect for all of them, and I hope that at some point in the near future these parties can unite to offer a beacon of hope to every UK citizen and the world in general. But before that happens, we need to make sure that the opposition, which is still the Labour Party, actually is an opposition, and that rests with electing Jeremy Corbyn. Were Angela Eagle and Owen Smith saying anything that I found remotely inspiring, Thangam Debbonaire's account may actually have convinced me to consider voting for one of them. But all they are doing is spouting the same empty rhetoric that we've all heard enough of, and I'm not convinced that anything would get better with either of them at the helm.

This is not about Jeremy Corbyn. This is about an opposition that actually listens to the concerns of the electorate and represents them. I'm not a fan of Margaret Thatcher at all, but I have some grudging respect for the fact that she managed to change the whole understanding of politics in this country. Of course, she changed it the wrong way, and we have never quite come out of the cold hard capitalist way of thinking since 1979. I'm hoping that Corbyn can achieve something similar for the left to what Thatcher did for the right, in terms of making politics generally more compassionate, and more about ordinary people than super-rich corporations. Doing that is about more than one man. If in time a less desirable side of him starts to come out, perhaps someone else will take over as an icon for those on the left. From a completely practical viewpoint, if we are to assume our next general election will be in 2020, he will be in his early seventies and for all we know be starting to think about retiring. But hopefully by that point he will have served his purpose, things will generally be better for the people in this country, and having a Government that works for the other 98% won't seem like a pipe dream. For that reason, save for major scandals there are very, very few things that would convince me to stop supporting Jeremy Corbyn, regardless of any negative sides of him that may come out. There is too much at stake to let accounts like that of Thangam Debbonaire dissuade us from supporting the most forward-thinking opposition leader that I have seen in my lifetime.

Earlier today, I paid £25 to register as a Labour Party supporter, granting me a vote in the election. You can do so here up until 5pm on Wednesday 20 July (tomorrow as of the time of writing this). We shouldn't have to pay that much, there is a lot of work going on behind the scenes to challenge this rule, but for now I think we have to be content with what we have, as there just isn't time to waste challenging this decision when we need to put everything we have into having our say. If you are struggling financially and can't pay that amount, there are ways to get help from other people. The JustGiving page has been closed down by the party, but the Facebook page Nye Bevan News, whilst it appears to be having some trouble, is still doing the best it can to help anyone vote who is struggling to find the funds, so please visit if you need any help or if you'd like to donate to anyone who does.

EDIT: Since writing this blog, I have come across this Facebook page which may be also very helpful to anyone struggling to cough up.

2 comments:

  1. Did you see Jeremy Corbyn's account of what happened on Newsnight yesterday? While conceding that he hadn't handled it very well, he said that at no time was Thangam sacked.

    Probably there's something in her story, but it's spun pretty hard. If she was appointed without her knowledge at a time when she was unable to take the post for medical reasons, why didn't she just send an email explaining that?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting, I didn't know that (and apologies for taking so long to respond, with everything that has been going on I haven't really been monitoring my comments as much as I should).

    ReplyDelete